Is a QDRO really necessary to divide retirement benefits?
Posted on May 26, 2016 10:30am PDT
Frank from Brooklyn, NY asks, "Is a QDRO really necessary to divide retirement benefits?"
Spencer Olsen from Pension Evaluators® at Troyan Inc.®, answers, "The short answer is yes. Federal laws do not permit a retirement
plan to distribute retirement benefits to the ex-spose of an employee
without a QDRO. Every qualified plan, including defined benefit plans,
ESOPs, 401(k) plans, and profit sharing plans, requires a QDRO to divide
benefits. Troyan maintains it is unsafe to utilize a plan model format
as often times they are a) catered to the pensioned spouse, and b) they
lack all the mechanisms to close all areas of exposure to insulate the
parties agreed upon award.
Troyan QDRO consulting firm focuses its practice primarily on employee
benefit plan matters for marital dissolution and economic loss matters.
As part of our overall Employee Benefits/ERISA practice, our firm has
enjoyed working with a large number of family law attorneys in all 50
states and their clients on pension appraisals and QDROs, employee benefits
plan, and ERISA related issues. We have extensive experience with: ·
Analyzing and evaluating the equitable distribution / community property
in retirement plans, including, but not limited to: · Drafting
/ reviewing PSA language and QDROs to divide these benefits. If you have
any questions regarding any of the items addressed herein, or any employee
benefits plan or QDRO issue, please do not hesitate to contact Troyan.
For more information, please contact: Phone: (800) 221-0706 ·
www.qdrosattroyan.com · 401(k) Plans, Profit Sharing Plans, ESOPs · Traditional
Pension Plans · IRAs · CSRS / FERS / TSP / Military / Railroad
/ 50 State Pensions Benefits · Stock Option Plans and Other Executive
Compensation Plans.
DISCLAIMER: Any legal information on this blog has been prepared by Troyan from informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. The material posted on this website is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Note that sending an e-mail to Troyan does not create an attorney-client relationship, and none will be formed unless there is an agreement between the firm and the individual.